A shortlist of nodes this platform does not have yet, ordered by how much each would change day-to-day use rather than by how interesting it is to write.
Everything here is a JavaScript file in nodes/ unless marked needs C++.
The runner already exposes http, storage (including the file store),
credentials, crypto, fs, process.exec, imap, smtp, mysql,
postgresql and utils - see nodes.md for the full API.
56 node definitions across: triggers (click, get/post/put, imap, schedule with cron and overlap control, error), flow control (if-condition, loop, wait), data (rss-reader, the six storage nodes), email (four imap nodes plus smtp-send), AI (ollama-chat, comfyui-prompt), integration (telegram-send, nextcloud-talk), media (image, via ImageMagick), OCR (seven nodes), database (mysql, postgresql), security (crypto), http (http-request) and developer (code).
Built. set-fields, switch, filter, merge, split-out, aggregate,
sort-limit-dedupe, template, json, datetime and stop-and-error all
live in nodes/core/, with a verification case each under tests/nodes/.
Two platform changes came with them: a node may declare dynamicOutputs to grow
an output per config entry, which is how switch works, and const inputs is
now parsed, which is how merge gets two input handles.
Built. respond-to-webhook, database-change, file-watch and
wait-for-approval all live in nodes/, with fixtures under tests/nodes/.
Three platform changes came with them: fs.readdir, so a node can see what is
in a directory; a _webhookResponse marker any node can return to set the
status, headers and body a webhook replies with; and resumable executions - an
execution can pause on a _pause marker and be continued later through
POST /api/v1/executions/{id}/resume, rebuilt from the workflow snapshot stored
with it.
Two things the original entries claimed turned out not to hold. The webhook controller never fired and forgot: it already waited for completion and returned a body, and what was missing was control over the status code, the headers, and which node decides the response. And File Watch could not be pure JavaScript, because the filesystem API had no way to list a directory.
Cron and interval scheduling are already covered by schedule-trigger,
including its overlap policy.
All pure JavaScript over http and credentials, in the same shape as
telegram-send.
http.request silently turns any method outside its list into GET
(src/runner/engine/script_engine.cpp, performHttpRequest), so PROPFIND,
MKCOL and MOVE need a small engine fix first. Worth doing regardless.crypto.hmac can carry. Mediumollama-chatcomfyui-prompt, for people not running
ComfyUIcomfyui-prompt submits graphs but cannot push an
input image to /upload/image, so image-to-image is out of reachprocess.exec with arguments, a timeout and
captured outputTier 1 is built, so the OpenAI-compatible chat node is what is left of the
original shortlist - one node covering OpenAI, OpenRouter, vLLM, LM Studio and
llama.cpp, built like ollama-chat.
Two entries are ranked below their worth, purely because they need engine work rather than a JavaScript file: Respond to Webhook and Execute Sub-workflow. For the platform to feel finished rather than merely well-stocked, those matter more than any ten integrations.